Somalia’s crisis made in USA
By
G. Dunkel
Published Dec 2, 2007 10:37 PM
The Somalian Transitional Federal Government, installed by Ethiopian troops at
the end of 2006, has decided to move the resistant population out of the
capital, an action it calls “empty the sea.” The resistance to its
rule in Mogadishu has been so strong, with attacks on Ethiopian troops lasting
for hours and involving mortars and other heavy weapons, and has so much mass
support, that the TFG took drastic measures.
The president of the TFG, Abdullahi Yusuf, a British- and U.S.-backed military
leader, wants the city empty. He said in Nairobi, Kenya, in mid-November, that
Mogadishu’s civilians can either choose to fight the Islamic insurgents
or they will themselves become targets of his “war on terror.”
(British Guardian, Nov. 21) Mogadishu’s Mayor Mohammed Dheere has accused
aid workers of “feeding terrorists” by helping those who have fled.
(The Age, Melbourne, Nov. 22.)
Nearly 200,000 residents of Mogadishu have been forced to flee as the fighting
intensified at the end of October and the beginning of November. Most have
joined unofficial refugee camps, already spread out along 20 miles of the road
west to Afgoi. They live under trees in the dust and pay to use latrines, which
is a recipe for cholera and other diseases that flourish in poor sanitation.
About one million of Somalia’s 10 million people are internally
displaced.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees considers Somalia worse off
than Darfur in Sudan. The hunger is greater, the violence more intense, yet no
major U.S. newspaper or TV channel has bothered to cover this rapidly unfolding
tragedy. African newspapers cover the Somalia events.
“If this happened in Darfur, there would be a major outcry,” said
Eric Laroche, the U.N.’s humanitarian co-coordinator for Somalia.
“Since it is in Somalia, no one cares. Somalia is a forgotten
emergency.”
While the UNHCR has complained, Anders Knudsen, who is program coordinator for
the Danish Refugee Council, says that the UNHCR carries a lot of the blame
itself because the UNHCR supports the TFG, which it recognized as the
legitimate government of Somalia.
Addressing the difficulties the U.N. has had in delivering supplies to the
refugees, Knudsen said, “The problem is that the United Nations-supported
transition government has no support from the population, and therefore the
U.N. emergency vehicles are not welcome among the clan militias, because they
regard the United Nations as the extended arm of the transition government and
Ethiopia in Mogadishu.”
While the corporate media may ignore Somalia, neither the European Union nor
the U.S. has forgotten it.
The European Parliament passed a resolution in Strasbourg, France, on Nov. 22,
condemning “the serious violations of international humanitarian law and
human rights law committed by all parties to the conflict in Somalia” and
calling for an immediate end to hostilities. French navy ships have been
escorting ships with relief supplies into Somalia’s southern ports
supposedly to protect them against pirates. These pirates have flourished since
the Siad Barre government, which was beholden to the U.S., was driven from
power.
Harvests in southern Somalia, the breadbasket of the country, have been nearly
destroyed by a combination of floods, drought and locust swarms.
The first U.S. setback in this African nation was in 1993 when two U.S.
helicopters hunting down “warlords” were shot down. Armed Somali
fighters killed 18 Marines who survived the crashes in the helicopters. This
incident was used as the basis of a book and film called “Black Hawk
Down” and forced the Clinton administration to withdraw the U.S.
occupation troops from Somalia.
Washington’s justification for its 1992-1993 intervention was that no
centralized state had asserted itself in Somalia after Barre’s fall in
1991. The Pentagon’s aborted intervention was supposed to be part of a
“peacekeeping mission.”
U.S. meddling in Somalia had begun much earlier, however. It first interfered
in Somalia in the late 1970s when Washington urged Barre to invade neighboring
Ethiopia, which at that time was led by a pro-socialist government allied with
the Soviet Union.
A number of liberal analysts and NGOs are again calling for this 1990s type of
“humanitarian” intervention. Washington justifies its current
intervention based on the alleged terrorist threat. The government the
Ethiopian intervention overthrew was based on “Islamic courts,”
which Washington considers an enemy.
While Somalia is a poor country whose major exports come from its herds and gum
arabic, it occupies a strategic position on the Horn of Africa. The major naval
base at Berbera allows any navy based there to control the flow of oil to
Europe and to China through the Red Sea. Thus, the interest of the EU and U.S.
to intervene in Somalia.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE