Oil and social gains
Why the U.S. is targeting Iran
Published May 5, 2007 12:39 AM
Why is Iran increasingly a target of U.S. threats? Who in Iran will be affected
if the Pentagon implements plans, already drawn up, to strike more than 10,000
targets in the first hours of a U.S. air barrage on Iran?
What changes in policy is Washington demanding of the Iranian government?
In the face of the debacle U.S. imperialism is facing in Iraq, U.S. threats
against Iran are discussed daily. This is not a secret operation. They
can’t be considered idle threats.
Two aircraft carriers—USS Eisenhower and USS Stennis—are still off
the coast of Iran, each one accompanied by a carrier strike group containing
Hornet and Superhornet fighter-bombers, electronic warfare aircraft,
anti-submarine and refueler planes, and airborne command-and-control planes.
Six guided-missile destroyers are also part of the armada.
Besides this vast array of firepower, the Pentagon has bases throughout the
Middle East able to attack Iran with cruise missiles and hundreds of
In fact, the U.S. is already engaged in a war on Iran. Ever-tightening
sanctions, from both the U.S. and U.N., restrict trade and the ordering of
equipment, spare parts and supplies.
Seymour Hersh reported in the New Yorker magazine a year ago that U.S. special operations forces were already
opepating inside Iran in preparation for a possible attack. U.S.-backed covert
operatives had entered Iran to organize sabotage, car bombings, kidnappings and
attacks on civilians, to collect targeting data and to foment anti-government ethnic-minority groups.
News articles have reported in recent months that the Pentagon has drawn up
plans for a military blitz that would strike 10,000 targets in the first day of
attacks. The aim is to destroy not just military targets but also airports,
rail lines, highways, bridges, ports, communication centers, power grids,
industrial centers, hospitals and public buildings.
It is important to understand internal developments in Iran today in order to
understand why this country is the focus of such continued hatred by U.S.
Every leading U.S. political figure has weighed in on the issue, from George W.
Bush, who has the power to order strikes, to Hillary Clinton, who has made her
support for an attack on Iran clear, to John McCain, who answered a
reporter’s question on policy toward Iran by chanting “Bomb, bomb,
bomb Iran” to the tune of the Beach Boys’ song, “Barbara
Ann.” The media—from the New York Times to the Washington Post to
banner headlines in the tabloid press to right-wing radio talk shows—are
playing a role in preparing the public for an attack.
The significance of oil production and oil reserves in Iran is well known.
Every news article, analysis or politician’s threat makes mention of
Iran’s oil. But the impact of Iran’s nationalization of its oil
resources is not well known.
The corporate owners in the U.S. want to keep it a secret from the people here.
They use all the power of their media to demonize the Iranian leadership and
caricature and ridicule the entire population, their culture and
What’s been achieved?
The focus of media coverage here is to describe Iran as medieval, backward and
feudal while somehow becoming a nuclear power.
It is never mentioned that more than half the university students in Iran are
women, or that more than a third of the doctors, 60 percent of civil servants
and 80 percent of all teachers in Iran are women. At the time of the 1979
Iranian Revolution, 90 percent of rural women were illiterate; in towns the
figure was over 45 percent.
Also ignored is the stunning achievement of full literacy for Iranian
Even the World Bank, now headed by Bush’s neocon appointee Paul
Wolfowitz, in its development report on countries admits that Iran has exceeded
the social gains of other countries in the Middle East.
According to that report, Iran has made the most progress in eliminating gender
disparities in education. Large numbers of increasingly well-educated women
have entered the work force.
Iran’s comprehensive social protection system includes the highest level
of pensions, disability insurance, job training programs, unemployment
insurance and disaster-relief programs. National subsidies make basic food,
housing and energy affordable to all.
An extensive national network going from primary health and preventive care to
sophisticated hospital care covers the entire population, both urban and rural.
More than 16,000 “health houses” are the cornerstone of the health
care system. Using simple technology, they provide vaccines, preventive care,
care for respiratory infections, diarrheal diseases, family planning and
contraceptive information, and pre-natal care. And they monitor
children’s nutrition and general health.
Since 1990, Iran nearly halved the infant mortality rate and increased life
expectancy by 10 years.
Iran sets record in family planning
A national family planning program, delivered through the primary health care
facilities and accompanied by a dramatic increase in contraceptive use, which
is approved by Islamic law, has led to a world record demographic change in
family size and maternal and child health. All forms of contraception are now
available for free.
In addition, promoting women’s education and employment while extending
social security and retirement benefits has alleviated the pressure to have
many children to protect security as parents grow older. The fertility rate
between 1976 and 2000 declined from 8.1 births per woman to 2.4 births in rural
areas and 1.8 births in urban areas.
These social programs, which cover the entire population of almost 70 million
people, should be compared to conditions in countries in the region that remain
under U.S. military and economic domination.
In Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates, only a
tiny part of the population has benefited from the vast profits generated by
oil and gas resources. In each of these countries the bulk of the people are
not even considered citizens. Millions are immigrant workers, usually the
overwhelming majority of the population, who have no rights to any
representation, participation or any social, health or educational programs or
Women in these countries face much more than religious restrictions on
clothing. They are barred from jobs, equal education and the right to control
their own bodies or their own funds. They cannot vote or even drive a car.
In Iraq, which before U.S. attacks began in 1991 had some of the best
conditions in the region for women, plus a high level of education, health,
nutrition and social services, the conditions of life have now deteriorated to
the level of the very poorest countries in the world. Legislation passed by the
U.S.-installed puppet government has stripped women of rights that were
Revolution made it all possible
The social gains of millions of Iranians are based on the upsurge of the
Iranian masses in the 1979 revolution. The overthrow of the U.S.-backed Shah
and the Pahlavi dynasty broke the hold of U.S. corporate power in Iran.
The Iranian Revolution was not a socialist revolution. Bourgeois rights to own
businesses, land, wealth and inheritance are still protected by law and by the
But the greatest source of wealth—Iran’s oil and gas—was
nationalized. Nationalization means the transfer of privately owned assets and
operations into public ownership. The exploration, drilling, maintenance,
transport, refining and shipping of oil and gas became the national property of
the Iranian people. Formerly this entire process was controlled at every step
by Western imperialists, particularly U.S. and British corporations.
Most of the administrators, executives, technicians and engineers who
controlled the process used to be from the West. Through hundreds of thousands
of contracts and sub-contracts, U.S. and British firms extracted a profit not
just through the sale of oil on the world markets but at every step of its
extraction and refining. The small portion of profit the Shah’s
government received, as in the Gulf States today, was spent on luxury items
imported from Western corporations for the small ruling elite and on
infrastructure and weapons systems purchased from U.S. military corporations,
again at an enormous profit.
The 1979 Iranian revolution, even though it brought a religious group to power,
was a profoundly radical and anti-imperialist revolution. Demonstrations of
millions openly confronted the brutally repressive police apparatus called the
Savak, who protected the small handful of corrupt U.S. collaborators. Religious
fervor, demands for social justice and militant anti-imperialism were bound
together in opposition to the U.S.-imposed Shah and the Pahlavi royal family,
which was hated for its program of a glitzy modernization of the urban
infrastructure alongside the growing impoverishment of both urban and rural
workers, farmers and much of the middle class.
All classes of society were profoundly shaken as millions of revolutionary
workers took to the streets. This was reflected not only in laws passed in
Parliament but in the Iranian constitution itself. The constitution states that
the government is required to provide every citizen with access to social
security for retirement, unemployment, old age, disability, accidents, health
and medical treatment—out of public revenue.
Prior to the revolution Iran had a shortage of medical staff and of trained
personnel of every kind. During the upheaval of the revolution and the years of
the Iran-Iraq war, many physicians, scientific and skilled personnel
Having broken free of U.S. corporate domination and control of its resources,
Iran was able to develop education, industry and infrastructure with
unprecedented speed. By 2004 the number of university students had increased by
six times over 1979. There are currently 2.2 million college students. The
largest and most prestigious programs encompass 54 state universities and 42
state medical schools where tuition, room and board are totally free. In
addition, 289 major private universities also receive substantial funding.
Millions of scientists, engineers, technicians, administrators, military
officers, teachers, civil servants and doctors have been trained.
Today Iran boasts modern cities, a large auto industry, and miles of new roads,
railroads and subways. Currently 55 Iranian pharmaceutical companies produce 96
percent of the medicines on the market in Iran. This allows a national
insurance system to reimburse drug expenses.
Soon to become operational is the largest pharmaceutical complex in southwest
Asia, which will produce compound drugs, making Iran a pioneer in
Years of U.S. sanctions and pressure on international financial institutions
have had an unexpected result: Iran is free of the crippling debt that has
strangled so many developing countries. According to World Bank figures,
Iran’s external debt is one of the lowest for its size: $11.9 billion, or
8.8 percent of the GDP. From the point of view of the imperialist world
bankers, this means the loss of many billions each year in interest payments to
Since 1979 there have been deep struggles inside Iran over how to deal with the
unrelenting pressure of the imperialist powers. There are differing approaches
on developments plans and who is favored or benefits most from these plans. But
all of the present forces are committed to maintaining Iran’s control of
Iran is not a monolithic state. No state is or could be. There are contending
groups even within the Muslim clergy that reflect different economic interests
and class forces. This is true also in the Iranian Parliament and among various
political parties and leaders.
Under President Mohammed Khatami, from 1997 to 2005, a “Reform
Movement” eased religious and social restrictions. But it also allowed
the introduction of neo-liberal economic policies, structural reforms and the
de-nationalizing or privatizing of some social programs along with the cutting
of subsidies. More joint ventures were initiated with European and Japanese
capital. Programs that benefited the “private sector” or the
wealthy and the middle class grew. This was the core of Khatami’s
The current leader, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran’s first non-cleric
president in 24 years, was elected in 2005 in a landslide victory after
promising to extend social security and pensions, improve the subsidies for
food and housing, deal with rising unemployment and guarantee a monthly
The Iranian people are determined to protect the substantial gains they have
made since the revolution. They are not interested in any effort that turns the
A Wall Street Journal Commentary by Francis Fukuyama on Feb. 1 was unusually
frank in explaining the growing problem faced by U.S. corporate power on a
“What is it that leaders like Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,
Hezbollah’s Hassan Nasrallah and Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez have in
common that vastly increases their local appeal? A foreign policy built around
anti-Americanism is, of course, a core component. But what has allowed them to
win elections and build support in their societies is less their foreign-policy
stances than their ability to promise, and to a certain extent deliver on,
social policy—things like education, health and other social services,
particularly for the poor. ...
“The U.S. and the political groups that it tends to support around the
world, by contrast, have relatively little to offer in this
Past and new threats
Iran’s program for nuclear power was actually initiated by the U.S. when
the Shah held dictatorial power. Nuclear energy is an important part of modern
industrial development. It is important in science, medicine and research. Only
after the overthrow of the Shah was Iran’s continued development of the
same program branded a threat by Washington.
The U.S. government has made every effort to sabotage all Iranian
infrastructure and industrial development, not only nuclear energy. Modern
technology—from elevators to cars, ships, jet aircraft and oil
refineries—needs constant upkeep. Parts for the re-supply and maintenance
of equipment the Iranians had purchased over decades from U.S. corporations
The most onerous sanctions were imposed in 1995 during the Clinton
The Iranian people, despite many different political currents, are united in
their determination not to lose their national sovereignty again.
Washington’s past use of sanctions, economic sabotage, political
destabilization and regime change is well remembered in Iran today.
Sanctions, the freezing of assets and an embargo on the export of Iranian oil
and all trade with Iran were first imposed in March 1951, after Prime Minister
Mohammed Mossadegh nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Iran was the first
country in the Middle East to take the bold step of reclaiming its national
wealth in the post-colonial era.
In 1953 using internal destabilization and massive external pressure, the CIA
orchestrated the overthrow of Mossadegh’s popularly elected government
and placed the Shah on the Peacock Throne. Oil was back under the control of
the U.S. and Britain, and 26 years of brutal repression followed.
Ever since the 1979 revolution and the decisive overthrow of the U.S.-supported
military dictatorship, Iran has had not a moment of peace from the Pentagon or
As Iran continues to grow and develop, U.S. imperialism is becoming
increasingly desperate to reverse this revolutionary process, whether through
sanctions, sabotage or bombing. But today it faces a population that is
stronger, more conscious and more skilled. On a world scale U.S. imperialism is
more isolated. Its hated occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan has left it
But the Pentagon is still capable of massive destruction. Its bases surround
Iran and it has sent an armada of ships to the Gulf. U.S. government threats
against Iran today must be taken as seriously as their devastating occupation
The forces opposing Washington’s policy of endless war—whether
waged through sanctions, coups, invasions, bombings or sabotage—should
stand with Iran, recognize its accomplishments, defend its gains and oppose
imperialism’s efforts to re-colonize the country.
Sources of information about Iran’s social development include:
“Iran’s Family Planning Program: Responding to a Nation’s
Needs,” by Farzaneh Roudi-Fahimi, Population Reference Bureau,
Washington, D.C., June 2002; “Tehran University Official Describes Iran
Health Care System to Harvard School of Public Health,” HSPH NOW, Jan.
24, 2003; World Bank.org—Iran—Country Brief; UNICEF—Info by
Country; Food & Agriculture Organization of
UN—Nutrition—Country Profiles; “Biggest Pharmaceutical Plant
to Open Soon,” Iran Daily, Feb. 4.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Support independent news DONATE