Follow workers.org on
RED HOT: TRAYVON MARTIN
CHINA,
AFGHANISTAN, FIGHTING RACISM, OCCUPY WALL STREET,
PEOPLE'S POWER, SAVE OUR POST OFFICES, WOMEN, AFRICA,
LIBYA, WISCONSIN WORKERS FIGHT BACK, SUPPORT STATE & LOCAL WORKERS,
EGYPT, NORTH AFRICA & MIDDLE EAST,
STOP FBI REPRESSION, RESIST ARIZONA RACISM, NO TO FRACKING, DEFEND PUBLIC EDUCATION, ANTI-WAR,
HEALTH CARE,
CUBA, CLIMATE CHANGE,
JOBS JOBS JOBS,
STOP FORECLOSURES, IRAN,
IRAQ, CAPITALIST CRISIS,
IMMIGRANTS, LGBT, POLITICAL PRISONERS,
KOREA,
HONDURAS, HAITI,
SOCIALISM,
GAZA
|
|
Chávez on referendum: 49 percent say yes to socialism
By
Berta Joubert-Ceci
Published Dec 5, 2007 11:23 PM
The Venezuelan National Electoral Commission (CNE) early on Dec. 3 announced
the results of the previous day’s referendum on proposed major changes to
69 articles of the Venezuelan Constitution. The “No” vote opposing
the reforms had won by a margin of less than 2 percent over the
“Yes” option, which would have deepened progressive changes and
ratified the reconstruction of society on a socialist basis.
Announcing the results on national radio and television, President Hugo
Chávez said that his proposed reform “could not happen for now, but
I continue to propose it, the most advanced in the planet and the one that aims
to reach the maximum social inclusion, a fundamental principle of our
system.”
Chávez emphasized that “as president of the nation, I have listened
to the voice of the people and will always keep listening to it. I will take it
into my heart for our analysis and to continue constructing the Bolivarian
Venezuela for our children.” In a later statement, he said, “We
will have to mature and continue building our socialism.”
When the news was known, forces opposed to the Bolivarian Revolution began
celebrating in the wealthy neighborhoods over what they called the “end
of Chávez” and the revolution—in other words, their hopes to
bring back the old system of privilege and wealth for the few and poverty and
exclusion for the majority.
Since Chávez took office in 1998, the pro-revolutionary forces had
prevailed in every local and national election, including the 2004 attempt by
the right wing to remove the president from office in a Recall Referendum and
the presidential reelection a year ago, in December 2006. They had won a total
of 10 electoral processes.
What happened this time? Is the revolution weakening? Is the right-wing
opposition getting stronger? Are the people disillusioned with the revolution
or opposed to the idea of building socialism in Venezuela? Besides the
electoral process, what methods can be used to advance the revolution?
Before any of those questions can be answered, we should look closely at the
results. Of the estimated 27 million Venezuelans, 16 million are registered to
vote. The election commission reported that 8,883,746 valid votes were counted,
reflecting a high level of abstention: 44 percent. In the presidential
elections a year ago, Chávez won with 63 percent of the vote and the
abstention rate was only 25 percent.
The Constitutional Referendum was complicated, with 69 articles divided into
two separate blocks, voted on separately. Taking both blocks, the results were
50-51 percent of the vote for the “No” option and 48-49 percent for
the “Yes.”
Several of the articles in question dealt with concrete issues like decreasing
the work hours and guaranteeing social security for workers in the informal
economy. Others dealt with more abstract matters that required careful study
and explanation. These included a new division of the national territory, how
to deal with a national emergency, and steps toward a transition to
socialism.
Efforts were made to inform the population about the proposed reforms. The
National Assembly distributed 10 million copies of the proposal between August
and October. A special phone line was established for consultation and more
than 9,000 events were held throughout the country.
However, it is clear that this was not enough. Bolivarian Venezuelans are now
in the process of seriously analyzing this outcome.
President Chávez said: “We were short 3 million people who did not
vote [this time]. Why? We have to evaluate this. I am completely sure that the
immense majority of those people are still with us. They did not vote for the
Yes; they abstained—doubts, fears, we did not have enough time, capacity
to explain. ... There are many political elements that we must consider in this
battle.”
He noted, however, that “The fact that 49 percent have voted for the
socialist project, in spite of everything, is a great political
step.”
U.S. behind the opposition
Despite the advances made on behalf of the poor majority, the capitalist mode
of production still exists in Venezuela. The U.S.-allied oligarchy is in a
constant fight against the progressive measures and the prospect of building
socialism.
The traditional opposition, the old parties of the Fourth Republic that carried
out the U.S.-instigated coup against Chávez in 2002, had been
fractionalized and weakened. But a new layer has surfaced that has brought hope
to the oligarchy. These are mostly the offspring of the white and wealthy
Venezuelan bourgeoisie. Some come from public colleges but most are from
private and Catholic colleges. They have been staging sometimes violent
demonstrations opposing the constitutional reform and complaining that
President Chávez wants to be a dictator-for-life because one of the
articles called for ending term limits on the presidency.
These sons and daughters of the rich hide under the banner of “freedom
and democracy,” showing arrogant and racist contempt against not only the
president but the poor and the rest of Venezuela’s youth, who are
strongly with the revolution.
U.S. imperialism is trying new tactics to stop the revolution. In the Dec. 2
Washington Post, Juan Forero wrote that “some student groups have
received funding for workshops from the U.S. Agency for International
Development, according to documents made available to The Washington Post on
Saturday. ... The U.S. documents, obtained through a freedom of information
request filed by a researcher for the National Security Archive at George
Washington University, show that $216,000 was provided from 2003 through this
year to unnamed student groups at several universities for ‘conflict
resolution,’ ‘democracy promotion’ and other
programs.”
In this deeply religious country, the Catholic Church has also played a
destabilizing role. Vice President Jorge Rodríguez sent a video to Papal
Nuncio Giacinto Berloco, recorded earlier in one of the Caracas churches,
showing calls to ignore the outcome of the elections if the Yes option won.
Another tactic used by the opposition was a severe food shortage, created
mostly by the hoarding of basic food items by the oligarchy’s
agribusiness and food distribution sector. For weeks many people had to stand
in long lines in the Mercales, the government-subsidized markets. This, the
oligarchs said, is what can happen under socialism. The campaign also tried to
scare people into thinking that a socialist government could take away their
children and homes.
In late November, Venezuelan counterintelligence obtained an internal CIA
memorandum on “Operation Tenaza [Pliers]” from the U.S. Embassy in
Caracas. The memo was authored by a CIA officer stationed in the embassy,
Michael Middleton Steere, and was addressed to CIA Director General Michael
Hayden in Washington.
It revealed different aspects of the CIA campaign against the revolution,
including the work of the USAID, the creation of fraudulent polls and the
distortion of information about the referendum in conjunction with private
national and international media. Multiple destabilizing actions described
range from violent street protests and the creation of a climate of
ungovernability to military intervention. President Chávez read the text
on television, calling on the people to be alert and ready for action.
The elation of the right wing may not last. The pro-revolutionary forces,
instead of feeling sad or defeated, are expressing a new enthusiasm for
advancing the revolution and building socialism.
Letters to the Web site Aporrea and statements of organized parties and
formations all point to the need to filter out what they call opportunist
elements around Chávez that are preventing the revolution from moving
forward and to increase the dialog with the population explaining the concepts
of socialism. One such opportunist is former Defense Minister Raúl
Isaías Baduel, who joined the opposition against the reforms, stating that
they represented a “constitutional coup.”
The revolutionaries also agree on the need for serious reflection and analysis
to try to correct any mistakes committed.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: [email protected]
Subscribe [email protected]
Support independent news DONATE
|
|