The Jena 6 and the right to self-defense
WW COMMENTARY
By
Larry Hales
Published Sep 24, 2007 9:38 PM
“I don’t favor violence. If we could bring about recognition
and respect of our people by peaceful means, well and good. Everybody would
like to reach his objectives peacefully. But I’m also a realist. The only
people in this country who are asked to be nonviolent are Black
people.”
“Nonviolence is only preached to Black Americans, and I don’t
go along with anyone who wants to teach our people nonviolence until someone at
the same time is teaching our enemy to be nonviolent. I believe we should
protect ourselves by any means necessary when we are attacked by
racists.”
—Malcolm X, 1965
Surely no Black person, for that matter any oppressed person, considers the
hanging of nooses a prank. Nor should any white person. Such a thing is never
done in jest, but is a threat of an intended action, a threat meant to control
behavior or actions. It is a threat of an oppressor to keep the oppressed in
line. The racists who hung the nooses were very clear on what they were
doing.
Thousands of Black people have been lynched in this country, extra-legally and
legally. There have been numerous studies of recorded lynchings of Black
people, especially between 1865 and 1965. There are no really accurate numbers
but most historians agree that these numbers range in the thousands, with the
largest disproportionate number taking place in the South beginning with the
end of Reconstruction.
The lynchings continued even after 1965. In 1981 19-year-old Michael Donald was
lynched in Alabama. James Byrd was dragged to his death in 1998 in Texas;
though he was not hanged with a rope, this is still considered a lynching.
So a noose is not a benign symbol.
The young Black students, now known as the Jena 6, who sat under the
“White Students Only” tree, challenging a racist code at the high
school in Jena, La., took a bold action. Their action is reminiscent of the
actions taken by SNCC (Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee) and other
groups at lunch counters during the Civil Rights era in the South.
When the oppressed resist or defend themselves, the state will seek to crush
any inkling of resistance and defense before racist terror.
This is so because racism is a weapon of the U.S. capitalist rulers. The
virulent ultra-right racists, such as the KKK or Nazi skinheads, are small. It
may be difficult to ascertain their actual numbers, but relative to the actual
number of people in the United States, their numbers are very small. Even the
Minutemen, racists who have doffed their white robes and hoods, are small in
number. They have attempted, but failed, to ally themselves with oppressed
nationalities who are U.S. citizens against immigrant workers—to divide
the unity of the oppressed.
But, as Sam Marcy, the late chairperson of Workers World Party, wrote in
“The Klan & the Government: Foes or Allies”: “The
financing and the spread of neo-fascist and downright KKK and Nazi groupings is
a logical supplement to the legal repressive and terrorist apparatus of the
capitalist state in times of need. For that reason, a short-lived perspective
in fighting the fascist menace is erroneous.”
Movements don’t spring up spontaneously. Marcy also pointed out,
“Capitalism is the fountainhead of political reaction in general and of
KKK and neo-Nazi terror in particular.”
Reaction springs from the system itself. While ultra-right groupings may appear
to be on the fringe and isolated, they never disappear and are never
insignificant under capitalism. Groups like the Minutemen, in seething
chauvinist fits, will try to appeal to the masses in an economic downturn, such
as is beginning now, but they exist to confuse workers in general, to divide
the oppressed from one another, but ultimately to maintain the white
supremacist-dominated U.S. capitalist system.
The events in Jena highlight perfectly the racism inherent and endemic to the
system. Many have and will continue to try to minimize the impact of hanging
nooses by labeling it as an isolated event or a prank.
Even in defense of the Jena 6, some may say, “It was just a school fight.
Why the ridiculous charges against the six young Black men?”
However, it should be stated emphatically that what the Black youths did was
self-defense and that it is the right of the oppressed to defend
themselves.
Demonization of Black youth
The state’s response is a symptom of the racist in-justice system. This
can be seen in the criminalization of the poor, especially people of color.
Black people make up half of the more than 2.2 million people incarcerated in
U.S. prisons. Add the number of people in jails and on parole or awaiting trial
and the number is over 8 million.
Unemployment in the Black community has been consistently in the double digits
and in major cities such as New York can be as high as 50 percent for young men
in their twenties. The lack of health care, education and other disparities are
all glaring in the case of Black people in the U.S., and similar for all the
oppressed.
Black people are vilified and Black men in particular are made society’s
pariah. These are the conditions the Jena 6—Robert Bailey Jr., 17; Theo
Shaw, 17; Carwin Jones, 18; Bryant Purvis, 17; Jessie Rae Beard, 14; and Mychal
Bell, 16—lived with at the time of their arrest.
When the nooses were hung from the tree, history compounded with the nature of
racism today. If Jena was and is not a racist place, as some white residents
have claimed—all while avoiding the mass march that symbolized an
uprising of Black people across the country in response to the Jena 6
case—then the students responsible would have been dealt with by the
white residents in solidarity with the Black residents.
This, however, is not what happened. A series of events occurred, including the
light treatment of the white students who hung the nooses; the threat by the
district attorney to make the lives of the Black students disappear with the
“stroke of his pen”; the beating of Robert Bailey; the pulling of a
shotgun on Robert Bailey and two of his friends, and subsequent theft charges
after the young men disarmed the white person.
Nothing was done. What were the young men to do in the wake of these attacks
and threats? What was left to them in a small town that is more than 85 percent
white?
When Justin Barker was attacked for jeering Robert Bailey and calling the young
men the “n” word, the young men were standing up and defending
their fellow students, themselves and the entire Black community.
The response of the local state officials was an assertion that young Black men
don’t have the right to self-defense—that they should cower and
hide, because the officials already showed they would not act to stop the
racists.
The Jena 6 are heroes and should be held in that light, as history will attest.
Their actions of defense were for the oppressed of Jena, for the people of New
Orleans, victims of police brutality and racist terror. Their actions and the
reaction of the state have awakened the Black masses and have sparked an
emerging uprising across the country.
It is up to the anti-racist, anti-imperialist movement to lift up the Jena 6.
Their freedom must be demanded. All charges should be dropped and the D.A.
stripped of his position and license to practice law. And the progressive and
working-class movements should affirm and support the right of the oppressed to
self-defense.
The writer is a leader of FIST (Fight Imperialism, Stand Together) youth group.
Contact [email protected].
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE