What’s in a name? Plenty, Ethiopia tells Starbucks
Published Nov 9, 2006 8:02 PM
How does the “free trade” pushed by U.S. corporations
Ethiopian coffee farmers don’t make enough in one whole day
to buy a latte at Starbucks. But the Ethiopian government has a
plan to change that. It’s seeking trademarks on
Ethiopia’s famous coffee names in hopes of getting a larger
share of their retail price. The charity group Oxfam estimates
that the trademarks could bring the Ethiopian coffee industry and
farmers an additional $88 million per year.
Starbucks, though, is standing in the way.
Last year the Ethiopian government filed applications with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to trademark the Sidamo, Harar
and Yirgacheffe coffee names. While Ethiopia received a trademark
for Yirgacheffe in August, the National Coffee Association and
Starbucks are opposing registration of the other two names.
“Coffee shops can sell Sidamo and Harar coffees for up to
$26 a pound because of the beans’ specialty status,”
Tadesse Meskela, head of the Oromia Coffee Farmers Cooperative
Union, said in an Oct. 26 Oxfam press release. “But
Ethiopian coffee farmers only earn between 60 cents to $1.10 for
their crop, barely enough to cover the cost of production. I
think most people would see that as an injustice.”
U.S. corporations are fiercely protective of what they regard as
their intellectual property. Patents on AIDS drugs have prevented
the people of Africa from obtaining low-cost versions of the
medicines. But when it comes to the resources of poor countries,
they have a double standard.
Starbucks is calling on Ethiopia to register the coffee names as
geographic indicators–names given to indicate the specific
place where a food, wine or spirit comes from. The PTO has
registered more than 100 geographic indications, including
Darjeeling for tea cultivated in Darjeeling, India. Once someone
receives a registration, only products produced in that region
may carry the geographic name.
Starbucks said in a press release that geographic certification
systems “are far more effective than registering trademarks
for geographically descriptive terms, which is actually contrary
to general trademark law and custom.”
That’s not what Starbucks was saying two years ago when it
tried to trademark one of Ethiopia’s coffee names. In 2004
it filed an application to register “Shirkina Sun-Dried
Sidamo” as a trademark. According to PTO’s website,
the application was abandoned in July. The Guardian reported Oct.
26 that the PTO had rejected Ethiopia’s application because
the word “Sidamo” was already in Starbucks’
application. The article says that once Starbucks’
application became inactive, the National Coffee Association
opposed Ethiopia’s application at the request of Starbucks.
The NCA and Starbucks both denied that the firm asked the
association to intervene.
Light Years IP, a non-profit group that seeks to alleviate
poverty by helping producers in developing countries gain
ownership of their intellectual property and use it to increase
their export income, has been helping the Ethiopian government
register trademarks for Harar, Sidamo and Yirgacheffe.
While these gourmet coffees are sold at a premium price at stores
like Starbucks, Ethiopia is exporting them at prices close to
those of commodity coffee. “Ethiopia receives only around 6
percent of the retail price their fine coffees earn in foreign
markets,” Light Years IP says on its Web site. “In
comparison, producers of Jamaican Blue Mountain Coffee capture 45
percent of their product’s retail price.”
Light Years IP says Ethiopia has already been granted trademarks
in more than 30 countries and plans to license the coffee names
to individual companies around the world free of charge. Now
that’s a deal you’re not likely to see at Starbucks.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Support independent news DONATE